Analysis Of Al-Aṣīl And Al-Dakhil Interpretation Of The Story Of Prophet Solomon's Trial QS. Ṣād In Tafsir Al-Ṭabarī
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Tafsir Jami' al-Bayan 'an Takwil Al-Qur’an by Ibn Jarir al-Tabari is a bi al-ma'thur tafsir book that is often used as a reference by other bi al-ma'thur tafsir books. But in his interpretation, al-Tabari uses a lot of israiliyyat history. In fact, not all israiliyyat history can be accepted and used as a reference. History of israiliyyat that contradicts religious law is rejected as a reference in interpreting the Qur'an. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the infiltration contained in al-Tabari's interpretation of the story of the test of Prophet Solomon in QS. This research method uses a descriptive-analytical approach with the theory of al-asil wa al-dakhil. The results of this study indicate the infiltration (dakhil) carried out by al-Tabari when interpreting surah Sad 34. In his interpretation, he cites israiliyyat history which states that the test of Prophet Solomon is that Satan has taken the ring which is the source of Prophet Solomon's strength and changed himself to resemble Prophet Solomon. This narration clearly contradicts Islamic shari'a because it is impossible for Satan to resemble the form of the Prophet who is an awake human being or ma'sum.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
References
Abdullah Muhammad bin Ismail al-Bukha>ri>. S}ah}i>h} Al-Bukha>ri>. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyah, 1992.
Abdurrohman, Asep. “Metodologi AL-Tabari Dalam Tafsir Jami’ Al-Bayan Fi ’Ulumil Qur’an.” Kordinat: Jurnal Komunikasi Antar Perguruan Tinggi Agama Islam 17 (2017): 72.
Abu> Ja’far Muh}ammad bin Jari>r al-T}abari>, Ja>mi’ Al-Baya>n ‘an Takwi>l Al-Qura>n. Ja>mi’ Al-Baya>n ‘an Takwi>l Al-Qura>n. Kairo: Dar Hajar, 1992.
Afandi, Mahdi, Abd Kholid, and Achmad Yafik Mursyid. “Discourse on the Best Interpretation Model : A Critical Review of Traditional Exegesis Products in the Early Era,” 2023, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.30762/qof.v7i1.1014.APA.
Amaruddin. “Mengungkap Tafsir Jami’ Al-Bayan Fi Tafsir Al-Qur’an Karya Ath-Thabari.” Syahadah 2, no. 2 (2014): 5–15.
Amrulloh, Muhammad Afif, Munirul Ikhwan, Universitas Islam, Negeri Raden, Intan Lampung, Kota Bandar Lampung, Universitas Islam, Negeri Sunan, and Kalijaga Yogyakarta. “STYLISTIC OF THE QUR ’ AN : Arabiyât” 8, no. 1 (2021): 17–31.
Arifin, Nabila El Mumtaza, Luqmanul Hakim, and Faizin Faizin. “Studi Intertekstualitas Tafsir Al-Thabari Dalam Tafsir Ibnu Katsir Tentang Kisah Bani Israil Tersesat Selama Empat Puluh Tahun.” An-Nida’ 44, no. 1 (2020): 77. https://doi.org/10.24014/an-nida.v44i1.12503.
Atabik, Ahmad. “Infiltration Of Israiliyyat Stories And Mawduất In Tafsir Fath Al-Qadir By Al-Shawkan.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Quran Dan Hadis 21, no. 2 (2020).
Azizatul, Nisa, Aida Andryanto, Putri Adinda, Yulia Handayani, and Andini Dwi Andani. “Tafsir Era Sahabat : Mengenal Tafsir Ibnu Abba>s” 7 (2024): 92–107.
Al-dzahabi, Husain. Al-Israiliyyat Fi Al-Tafsir Wa Al-Hadith. Kairo: al-azhar, n.d.
Farhani, Aan, and Taufiq Hidayat. “Studi Naskah Kitab Tafsir Bahasa Arab: Jami’ Al-Bayan Fi Ta’wil Al-Qur’an Karya Imam Al-Thabari.” Jurnal Tafsere 10, no. 1 (2023): 39–61. https://doi.org/10.24252/jt.v10i1.35549.
Furqan, Furqan. “Metodologi Tafsir Jami’ Al-Bayan Imam Thabari.” TAFSE: Journal of Qur’anic Studies 8, no. 1 (2023): 88. https://doi.org/10.22373/tafse.v8i1.18397.
Garut, Stai Persis, and Qoree Butlam. “METHODOLOGY OF TAFSEER AL-QUR ṬŪ B Ī : SOURCES , STYLES AND MANHAJ Abdul Rohman Barikli Mubaroka” 2, no. 2 (n.d.): 180–202. https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v2i2.1451.
Ghozali, Moh. Alwy Amru. “Menyoal Legalitas Tafsir ( Telaah Kritis Konsep Al-ashil Wa Al-dakhil ).” Jurnal Tafsere 6, no. 2 (2018): 67–86.
Hajar, Aprilita, and Abdul Kadir Riyadi. “Analisis Kesalah Pahaman Kisah Israiliyat Dalam Penafsiran Al-Qur’an.” Studia Quranika 7, no. 2 (2023): 285–306. https://doi.org/10.21111/studiquran.v7i2.8552.
Hakim, Lukman. “IDENTIFIKASI DAN ANALISIS AL- DAKHIL DALAM QIRA ’ AT,” 2024, 153–64. https://doi.org/10.30868/at.v9i01.6616.
Harahap, Nursapia. “Penelitian Kepustakaan.” Jurnal Iqra 08, no. 01 (2014).
Hibatullah, Alif. “Analisis Al-dakhil Kisah Nabi Sulaiman Dalam Tafsir Al-Iklil Karya Misbah Mustafa.” MAGHZA: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir 8, no. 1 (2023): 133.
Imas, Masriani. “Kajian Israiliyat Dalam Tafsir At-Thabari.” HUMANISTIKA : Jurnal Keislaman 8, no. 2 (2022): 204–30. https://doi.org/10.55210/humanistika.v8i2.759.
Irwanto. “Analisis Al-ashil Wa Ad-Dakhil Pada Catatan Kaki Terjemahan Al-Qur’an Kementerian Agama Edisi Penyempurnaan 2019.” Liwaul Dakwah: Jurnal Kajian Dakwah Dan Masyarakat Islam 12, no. 1 (2022): 1–17.
Iya>zy, Muh}ammad Ali. Al-mufassiru>n H}aya>tuhum Wa Manhajuhum,. Teheran: Muassasah At-Taba’ah Wa An-Nasr Wuzarah As-Saqofah Wa Al-Irsyad Al-Islamy, 1373.
———. Al-mufassiru>n H}aya>tuhum Wa Manhajuhum. Teheran: Muassasah At-Taba’ah Wa An-Nasr Wuzarah As-Saqofah Wa Al-Irsyad Al-Islamy, 1373.
Khoirur, Ahmad, Rozikin Dosen, Stiq Wali, and Songo Situbondo. “Analisis Kritis Terhadap Isu Negatif Abu Hurairah Dan Ibnu Abba>s Dalam Israiliyyat,” n.d., 27–47.
Levi, Ahmad, Fachrul Avivy, and Mazlan Ibrahim. “Isra ’ Iliyyat in Interpretive Literature of Indonesia : A Comparison between Tafsir Marah Labid and Tafsir Al-azhar” 6, no. 3 (2015): 401–7. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n3s2p401.
Masilaturrohmah, Masilaturrohmah, and Mohammad Jufriyadi Sholeh. “Ragam Riwayat Dan Tafsir Kisah Sulaiman Dalam Al-dakhil Fi Al-Tafsir.” Jurnal Tafsere 9 (2021): 168–91. https://doi.org/10.24252/jt.v9i02.31491.
Mawardi. “Subjektivitas Dalam Penafsiran Alquran: Fenomena Tafsir Bercorak Sektarian” 3, no. 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.32505/tibyan.v3i1.483.
Muh}ammad al-T}a>hir bin Muh}ammad bin Muh}ammad al-T}a>hir bin ’Ashu>r. Al-Tah}ri>r Wa Al-Tanwi>r. Tunisia: al-da>r al-Tu>nisiyah li Nashr, 1984.
Muhtar, Zainuddin, and Ibnu Abbas. “IBNU ABBAS ( STUDI BIOGRAFI GENERASI AWAL MUFASSIR AL QURAN )” 1 (2019): 96–107.
Muhammad Afif, Adistia, Yusril, Nur Baitul Izzah, Nikmah,. “Telaah Kitab Tafsir Ath-Thabari Dalam Q.S Al-maidah Ayat 51.” Al-munir: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir 1, no. 02 (2020): 55–78. https://doi.org/10.24239/al-munir.v1i02.36.
Mujiburrohman. “Al-dakhil Dalam Ra’Yi Dan Ma’Tsur.” Ahsana Media 6, no. 1 (2020). http://journal.uim.ac.id/index.php/ahsanamedia.
Mukhlis, Zen Fuad, Syahidin Syahidin, and Aceng Kosasih. “Kematangan Beragama Perspektif Al-Qur’an.” ZAD Al-mufassirin 5, no. 2 (2023): 227–45. https://doi.org/10.55759/zam.v5i2.120.
Munawaroh, Siti. “Israiliyyat Pada Kisah Nabi Sulaiman Dalam Tafsir Thabari Israiliyyat in the Story of Prophet Sulaiman in Tafsir Thabari.” Al-Karima Voleme 2,N (2018).
Al-Naisa>bu>ri>, Muslim bin Hajja>j. S}ah}i>h} Muslim. Beirut: Da>r Ih}ya>’ al-Tura>th al-’Arabi, n.d.
Al-Nasa>i. Sunan Al-Nasa>i. Beirut: Da>r al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyah, 1988.
Nana Najatul Huda. “Analisis Sistematis Corak-Corak Tafsir Periode Pertengahan Antara Masa Klasik Dan Modern-Kontemporer.” Gunung Djati Conference Series 8 (2022): 142–54.
Nasir, M. Ridwan. Memahami Al-Qur’an Perspektif Baru Metodologi Tafsir Muqarin. Surabaya: Koordinator Perguruan Tinggi Agama Islam Swasta (KOPERTAIS) wilayah IV, 2009.
Nikmah, Siar. “Al-dakhil Dalam Tafsir.” Kaca 3, no. 1 (2019): 44–64.
Nirwana, Andri, Ita Purnama Sari, Suharjianto Suharjianto, and Syamsul Hidayat. “Kajian Kritik Pada Bentuk Dan Pengaruh Positif Al-dakhil Dalam Tafsir Jalalain Tentang Kisah Nabi Musa Dan Khidir.” AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis 5, no. 2 (2021): 717. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v5i2.2774.
Nuryansah, Mohamad. “ISRAILIAT CONTRIBUTION IN CONTEMPORARY EXEGESIS : ( THE EFFORT TO ESTABLISH ISRAILIAT WHICH IS SILENCED ‘ MAUQUF ’ AS A SOURCE OF AN INTERPRETATION )” 137, no. Icqhs 2017 (2018): 38–42.
Qut}b, Sayyid. Fi> Z}ila>l Al-Qur’an>, Vol 5. Kairo, 1968.
RI, Departemen Agama. Al-Qur’an Dan Terjemahannya. Menara Kudus, n.d.
Ridha, M. “Tafsir Surat Al-Lahab: Analisis Atas Kitab Jamial-Bayan Karya Al-Thabari.” Al-Furqan, 2016, 61–69. https://ejournal.staidapayakumbuh.ac.id/index.php/alfurqan/article/view/27%0Ahttps://ejournal.staidapayakumbuh.ac.id/index.php/alfurqan/article/download/27/26.
Rizki, Intan Sri. “Riwayat Israiliyyat Kisah Nabi Sulaiman A.S Dalam Tafsir Jami’ul Bayan Karya Ibn Jarir Al-Thabary (229 H/831 M) Serta Implikasinya Terhadap Syari’at Islam,” 2021.
Rusydi, Ibnu, and Siti Zolehah. “Telaah Atas Kitab Tarikh Al-rusul Wa Al-muluk Karya Al-Tabari Al-afkar.” Al-afkar, Journal for Islamic Studies 1, no. 2 (2018): 142–59. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3554866.
Saputra, Adha, and Lira Erlina. “Nilai-Nilai Rahmat Islam Dalam Konsep Hudud.” ZAD Al-mufassirin 5, no. 2 (2023): 267–91. https://doi.org/10.55759/zam.v5i2.195.
Shihab, M. Quraish. Tafsir Al-mishbah. Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2006.
Simangunsong, Ali Abdurahman, and Misnawati. “Exploring the Wisdom of Prophet Sulaiman’s Story and the Hoopoe Through the Lens of Wahbah Zuhayli in Al-Tafsir Al-munir.” Tafse: Journal of Qur’anic Studies 9, no. 1 (2024): 95–108. https://doi.org/10.22373/tafse.v9i1.21535.
Suherman, Eman, and Khairul Katsirin. “Corak Dan Logika Penafsiran At-Thabari Dalam Jâmi’ul Bayân ‘an Ta’Wîlil Qur’ân.” Aksioreligia 1, no. 1 (2023): 35–45. https://doi.org/10.59996/aksioreligia.v1i1.73.
Susanti Abidin Bahren, Rina, and Sabil Mokodenseho. “Metode Dan Corak Penafsiran Ath-Thabari.” MUSHAF JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran Dan Hadis 3, no. 1 (2023): 151–66. https://doi.org/10.54443/mushaf.v3i1.126.
Al-Tirmidhi>, Muh}ammad bin ’Isa> bin Saurah bin Musa. Sunan Al-Tirmidhi>. Mesir: Shirkah Maktabah wa Mart}ba’ah, 1975.
Ulinnuha, Muhammad. Metode Kritik Ad-Dakhil Fit-Tafsir Cara Mendeteksi Adanya Infiltrasi Dan Kontaminasi Dalam Penafsiran Al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Qaf, 2019.
Umami, Khoirul. Al-dakhil Dalam Tafsir MTA. Depok: Rajawali Buana Pusaka, 2021.
Yusron, M. Agus. “Memahami Tafsir Dan Urgensinya.” ZAD Al-mufassirin 4, no. 1 (2022): 61–81. https://doi.org/10.55759/zam.v4i1.35.Afandi, Mahdi, Abd Kholid, and Achmad Yafik Mursyid. “Discourse on the Best Interpretation Model : A Critical Review of Traditional Exegesis Products in the Early Era,” 2023, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.30762/qof.v7i1.1014.APA.
Zaelani, Agung Ahmad. “The Essence of Isra ’ Iliyyat Story in Tafsir Al-Qur ’ an.” Jurnal Iman Dan Spiritualitas 4, no. 3 (2024): 201–8.